Here's one frame:

And maybe my favorite, a rendition of the mall during the inauguration:

Obama has inherited victory in Iraq. Bush has done more than, as McGurn
quotes Biden in early 2007, "keep it from totally collapsing...[until he could]
hand it off to the next guy." Now rather than retreat in defeat, our new
president must manage to withdraw American troops without undermining their
success. It will be a tremendous challenge, but the press will not be able to
blame Bush if security deteriorates in Iraq after Obama gives the Joint Chiefs
their "new mission." The victory in Iraq is Obama's to lose.
...the outcome in Iraq is a remarkable gift to the incoming president, who now only has to sustain success, rather than trying to deal with the consequences in the region and around the world of a humiliating withdrawal and a devastating defeat.So, Barack Obama should be thankful to W for handing him the war in Iraq. W has been right about this all along, and thank goodness he was in power as long as he was.
The irony is that X-ers -- a sociocultural label typically used to describe those born between 1961 and 1976 -- have become invisible at a time when they are changing the face of politics. As Jerome Armstrong, founder of MyDD.com and best known as the Blogfather of the progressive netroots, says, "It's people drawn from Generation X -- the people who have gotten involved in politics this decade -- who have brought about the whole new movement of progressive Democrats."
It’s true, I did break bread with Obama. It was amazing. He was carried into the house by cherubs, Bruce Springsteen and Oprah Winfrey spread rose petals on the carpet where he was about to walk and he very considerately asked me what vintage of wine I wanted my water turned into.
It’s also a sign that Obama can talk to and understand Americans at all social levels. For example, that night with us, he had an elegant dinner filled with sophisticated ideas and complex policy conversation with a bunch of right-leaning commentators. Then the next day, he had a meeting with some liberal commentators where, I presume, he was just as fluid while using much simpler sentences, shorter words and serving Froot Loops and Hostess Twinkies. There are pundits at all levels of cognitive distinction, and Obama has to learn to address all of them.
The Constitution’s text is simple enough: “Each house shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members.” Since no one disputes that Mr. Burris, a former Illinois attorney general, possesses the constitutional qualifications of age, residency and citizenship, the remaining issue is whether the Senate can adjudge Mr. Burris not to have been properly appointed. Although federal prosecutors are seeking a corruption indictment of Mr. Blagojevich, he is in fact still the governor. The charges that he sought bribes to appoint certain candidates to the Senate do not automatically render illegal other official acts of his office like signing laws or pardoning criminals. And because there is no evidence that a bribe was solicited from, or proffered by, Mr. Burris, his appointment is presumptively lawful.Seating Burris is unquestionably within the law. Not seating him, not so much. This whole thing is an unnecessary distraction and should be brought to a swift and decisive end by the Senate.